Table of Contents
The Frustrating Paradox of “Doing Everything Right”
As a biochemist, I’ve spent my career studying the intricate molecular machinery of the human body.
I understand, on a fundamental level, how nutrients fuel our cells.
Yet, for years, I lived with a frustrating paradox.
My professional knowledge told me that vitamin C was a cornerstone of health—a vital antioxidant essential for immune function and collagen synthesis.1
But my personal experience told a different story.
Like many health-conscious people, I followed the conventional wisdom.
At the first sign of a sniffle, during periods of high stress, or before traveling, I’d reach for high-dose vitamin C tablets, often taking 2,000 mg or more per day.
The result was never the robust immunity I was hoping for.
Instead, it was predictable and debilitating gastrointestinal distress: stomach cramps, bloating, and urgent trips to the bathroom.2
This created a nagging cognitive dissonance.
I knew vitamin C was crucial, but my body was clearly rejecting the very strategy I was using to get it.
This led me down a rabbit hole, driven by a simple but profound question: Why does taking more of an essential nutrient feel so punishing and ineffective? Is the problem with vitamin C itself, or is it with how we’re trying to get it into our bodies? What I discovered didn’t just change my supplement routine; it revealed a fundamental flaw in how most of us approach nutrition and gave me a new framework for separating scientific reality from marketing hype.
Part 1: The Vitamin C Conundrum: Why More Isn’t Always Better
My investigation began by revisiting the basic biology of how we absorb this supposedly simple vitamin.
It turns out, the common “more is better” approach runs headfirst into a hard-coded biological bottleneck.
The Body’s Gatekeeper: Understanding the Absorption Ceiling
When you ingest vitamin C, or ascorbic acid, it’s absorbed primarily in the small intestine.
But it doesn’t just seep through the intestinal wall.
It has to be actively carried across by specific protein channels called Sodium-Dependent Vitamin C Transporters, or SVCTs—with SVCT1 being the main player.1
Think of these transporters as a limited number of doorways into a building.
At low, dietary-level doses—say, up to 200 mg at a time—there are plenty of open doorways, and absorption is incredibly efficient, approaching 100%.3
Your body gets everything you give it.
However, as you dramatically increase the dose, you overwhelm the system.
When you take a 500 mg or 1,000 mg supplement, all the SVCT1 “doorways” become occupied.
A queue forms, and the absorption efficiency plummets.
At doses above 500 mg, you may absorb less than 50% of the vitamin C you ingest.3
Once your blood plasma levels reach their saturation point—typically around 60 to 80 micromoles per liter (
μmol/L)—your kidneys kick into high gear, actively filtering out and excreting any excess into your urine, often within a few hours.3
This reveals the “megadose myth” as a fundamental misunderstanding of biological logistics, not chemistry.
Many people hear that vitamin C is “water-soluble” and that “excess is excreted,” leading them to believe there’s no harm in taking massive doses.10
They mistake “not acutely toxic” for “effective.” But the science of SVCT1 saturation shows this is a deeply flawed assumption.
The real limitation isn’t the vitamin itself; it’s the
transport infrastructure in our bodies.
Taking a 2,000 mg tablet is like trying to force 2,000 people through a building with only 200 doors.
The vast majority will be left outside, unable to get in, and the entire operation becomes chaotic and wasteful.
Megadosing standard vitamin C isn’t just inefficient; it’s an approach that completely ignores the very biological system it’s trying to support.
The Unpleasant Aftermath: Why High Doses Cause GI Distress
So, what happens to all that unabsorbed vitamin C left stranded in your intestine? It doesn’t just vanish.
It continues its journey into the large intestine, where it creates an osmotic effect.
Like a sponge, it draws water from your body into your gut.
This influx of water is the direct cause of the well-documented side effects that plagued me for years: diarrhea, gas, bloating, and painful stomach cramps.2
This realization was a critical shift in my perspective.
The gastrointestinal distress I had been experiencing wasn’t a sign of the supplement’s “potency” or that it was “working hard.” It was a direct, physiological symptom of its failure.
My body was sending me a clear biofeedback signal: the dose had far exceeded its absorption capacity for that delivery method, and the “extra” vitamin C was not only being wasted but was actively causing harm and discomfort.
It was a message of profound inefficiency.
A Tour of the Usual Suspects: Tablets, Powders, and Gummies
This understanding of the absorption bottleneck casts a new light on the seemingly diverse vitamin C aisle at the pharmacy.
While the forms look different, most of them are just different costumes for the same actor: standard ascorbic acid, subject to the exact same biological limitations.
- Tablets and Capsules: These are the most common and cheapest options. They are convenient but can be difficult for some to swallow and are the primary culprits in the megadose-and-GI-distress cycle that many people experience.13
- Powders: These allow for more customized dosing and can be a good option for those who can’t swallow pills. However, they are often messy, can have a very acidic and unpleasant taste, and will still cause the same GI issues as tablets when taken in high doses because they deliver the same basic ascorbic acid.14
- Gummies and Chewables: These are certainly more palatable, especially for children or adults who dislike pills. The major downside is that they are often little more than candy. Many are loaded with sugar, which is not only counterproductive to general health but can also actively interfere with vitamin C absorption, as glucose and ascorbic acid can compete for transport into cells.13
This analysis led me to a sobering conclusion: the perceived “choice” in the conventional vitamin C market is largely an illusion of variety.
It’s a marketing strategy that masks a fundamental lack of innovation in delivery.
The industry has focused on selling superficial form factors—pills for convenience, powders for customization, gummies for taste—rather than solving the core scientific problem of bioavailability.
The choice is about your preferred method of consumption, not about biological effectiveness.
This realization empowers us to look past these surface-level distinctions and ask a much more important question: “This is all well and good, but how does this stuff actually get into my cells?”
Part 2: The “Armored Car” Epiphany: A New Paradigm for Nutrient Delivery
My frustration as both a scientist and a consumer pushed me to look for answers outside the standard nutrition playbook.
I began asking a different question: “How do pharmaceutical scientists deliver fragile, hard-to-absorb drug molecules to specific targets in the body?” It was in this world of pharmacology and advanced drug delivery that I found the answer: liposomal encapsulation technology.19
This discovery was my “aha!” moment, and it gave me a powerful new analogy for understanding nutrient delivery.
The Analogy: Mailing Cash vs. An Armored Car Service
To grasp the revolutionary difference in delivery systems, let’s forget about vitamins for a moment and think about delivering something valuable, like cash, to a secure bank.
- Standard Vitamin C is like Mailing Cash in a Paper Envelope. The vitamin C is the “cash.” Your digestive system is the “postal service.” The paper envelope is flimsy. Along the way, it gets exposed to harsh conditions—rain, rough handling (your stomach acid)—which can damage the envelope and its contents. When it finally arrives at the bank (your cells), it has to be pushed through a single, small mail slot (the SVCT1 transporter). You can only feed so many envelopes through that slot per hour. If you try to send a huge sack of cash all at once, you create a massive pile-up at the mail slot. Most of the envelopes get lost, damaged, or simply thrown away (excreted), and the pile-up creates a messy problem (GI distress). It’s an inefficient, insecure, and wasteful system for delivering something valuable.
- Liposomal Vitamin C is like an Armored Car Service. Here, the “cash” (vitamin C) is sealed inside a heavily protected liposome (the “armored car”). The liposome’s outer shell, made of phospholipids, is the armor, completely shielding the valuable contents from the harsh environment of the digestive tract. But here’s the most brilliant part: the armored car is built from the exact same materials as the bank’s loading dock (your cell membrane). So, it doesn’t need to use the tiny, congested mail slot. It drives right up to the bank, bypasses the queue, and fuses directly with the loading dock wall, allowing for a direct, secure, and complete transfer of its contents straight inside the bank.19 This is a targeted, protected, and vastly more efficient delivery system.
The Science Behind the “Armored Car”: How Liposomes Work
This analogy isn’t just a clever story; it perfectly illustrates the underlying science.
Liposomes are microscopic, hollow spheres made from phospholipids, the very same molecules that make up our own cell membranes.20
This unique structure allows them to do two critical things.
First, they can encapsulate water-soluble nutrients like vitamin C inside their hollow, aqueous core.
This protective bubble shields the vitamin C from being degraded by stomach acid and other digestive enzymes.
Second, because their outer shell is made of lipids (fats), they are absorbed differently from standard, water-soluble vitamin C.
Instead of relying on the easily saturated SVCT1 “mail slots,” they are absorbed through the lymphatic system in the gut, similar to how we absorb fats.
This allows them to completely bypass the primary absorption bottleneck.
When they eventually reach our cells, their phospholipid exterior allows them to fuse directly with the cell membrane, releasing their vitamin C payload directly inside the cell where it’s needed most.19
This isn’t just a theoretical advantage.
It has been validated by rigorous clinical research.
A key randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study compared the effects of taking 1 gram of liposome-encapsulated vitamin C (LEC) versus 1 gram of standard, un-encapsulated ascorbic acid (AA).
The results were definitive.
The group taking the liposomal form showed significantly higher and more sustained blood plasma levels of vitamin C at all measured timepoints—2, 4, and 6 hours post-ingestion.25
Another study found that liposomal C led to a 30% increase in the total amount of vitamin C absorbed into the bloodstream over 24 hours compared to the non-encapsulated form.26
Furthermore, the “armored car” itself provides an extra benefit.
The phospholipids that make up the liposome are valuable nutrients in their own right, supporting cell membrane health and demonstrating their own anti-inflammatory and immune-modulating effects.21
This is a delivery system that not only works better but also contributes to the overall mission.
Part 3: A Biochemist’s Guide to the Vitamin C Marketplace
Armed with this new “Armored Car” framework, the confusing supplement aisle suddenly becomes much clearer.
The key isn’t the form factor—tablet, powder, or liquid—but the underlying delivery technology.
Not All Vitamin C is Created Equal: A Comparative Analysis
We can now categorize the common types of vitamin C supplements based on their true biological mechanism, not just their marketing.
| The Vitamin C Showdown: A Comparative Guide | ||||||
| Supplement Form | Delivery Analogy | Absorption Mechanism | Bioavailability | Key Pros | Key Cons | Ideal Use Case |
| Standard Ascorbic Acid (Tablets/Powder/Gummies) | “Paper Envelope” | Relies on limited SVCT1 transporters | Low to moderate; absorption decreases sharply with higher doses 3 | Inexpensive, widely available. | High doses cause GI distress; inefficient absorption.4 | Basic dietary top-up at low doses (under 200 mg). |
| Buffered Mineral Ascorbates (e.g., Calcium Ascorbate) | “Padded Envelope” | Relies on limited SVCT1 transporters | Low to moderate; still limited by transporters 7 | Gentler on the stomach than pure ascorbic acid.14 | Still inefficient at high doses; contributes to mineral load. | Individuals with sensitive stomachs needing low-to-moderate doses. |
| Liposomal Vitamin C (Liquid/Capsule) | “Armored Car” | Bypasses SVCT1 via lipid absorption and direct cell fusion 19 | High; significantly more bioavailable and sustained than other forms 25 | Highest bioavailability; no GI distress even at high doses.21 | Most expensive; market is rife with fraudulent products. | Those with high needs, seeking maximum impact, or who experience GI issues with other forms. |
The Liquid Myth: Why “Liquid” Doesn’t Automatically Mean “Better”
One of the most pervasive misconceptions in the supplement world is that “liquid” automatically means “better absorbed.” Marketers capitalize on this intuitive bias, but it’s scientifically misleading.
Many products sold as “liquid vitamin C” are nothing more than standard ascorbic acid dissolved in a water-based solution.15
They offer no bioavailability advantage over a simple powder mixed in water because they still rely entirely on the same saturated SVCT1 “mail slot” transporters.27
Worse, to make these liquids palatable and shelf-stable, they are often loaded with undesirable additives like high fructose corn syrup, sorbitol, sucrose, and artificial preservatives.28
You might be paying a premium for a product that is not only no more effective than a cheap tablet but may also contain ingredients that are actively detrimental to your health goals.
The critical takeaway is to shift your thinking.
The true differentiator is not the physical state of the supplement (solid vs. liquid) but the delivery technology.
A consumer who asks “Is it liquid?” is falling for a marketing trick.
A savvy, empowered consumer asks, “Is it liposomal?” This question cuts through the noise and focuses on the only thing that matters for high-dose efficacy: the delivery mechanism.
Who Needs More? Personalizing Your Vitamin C Intake
While the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for vitamin C is relatively low (90 mg/day for men, 75 mg/day for women), this is the amount needed to prevent the acute deficiency disease scurvy, not the amount needed for optimal health.4
Certain factors significantly increase the body’s demand for vitamin C, making a highly bioavailable form like liposomal C a more critical and logical choice.
- Smoking: Smokers are under constant oxidative stress, which rapidly depletes vitamin C. Studies show they have lower vitamin C levels and require a much higher daily intake—around 165 mg/day—just to reach the same blood concentration as a non-smoker consuming 110 mg/day.18
- Body Weight: Vitamin C is distributed throughout the body’s water-based tissues. In individuals with higher body weight, the same dose of vitamin C becomes more diluted, resulting in lower plasma concentrations. This “volumetric dilution” effect means heavier individuals require a higher intake to achieve optimal levels.30
- Stress and Illness: Both physical and psychological stress are known to deplete vitamin C levels. During illness or infection, immune cells consume large amounts of vitamin C to fight pathogens and manage oxidative stress, increasing the body’s requirements substantially.3
For individuals in these categories, trying to meet their elevated needs with standard ascorbic acid is a recipe for waste and GI distress.
A high-bioavailability liposomal form becomes a far more efficient and comfortable strategy.
Part 4: The Liposomal Litmus Test: How to Spot a High-Performer from a Fraud
The promise of liposomal technology is immense, but it has created a new problem: a “Wild West” marketplace where fraudulent products and misleading claims are rampant.
Because the FDA does not approve dietary supplements for safety or efficacy before they hit shelves, the responsibility falls on the manufacturer to be honest and on the consumer to be vigilant.32
A stark real-world example of this is the case of the UK’s Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) versus the supplement brand YourZooki.
After a lengthy investigation spurred by a competitor’s complaint, the ASA ruled that YourZooki’s claims of selling “liposomal vitamin C” were misleading and unsubstantiated.
The company could not provide conclusive evidence that its product actually contained the liposomes it was advertising and charging a premium for.33
This case is a crucial warning: the word “liposomal” on a label is not a guarantee of quality; it is merely a claim that requires verification.
The “Liposomal” Deception: Common Marketing Tricks
To navigate this treacherous market, you need to be aware of the common tricks used to sell substandard products:
- The “Dry Mix” Fallacy: Some unscrupulous manufacturers simply mix powdered ascorbic acid with a phospholipid powder like lecithin and label the result “liposomal.” This is a sham. True liposomes are not formed by simply mixing dry ingredients; they require a specific, energy-intensive manufacturing process in a liquid environment.35
- The “Liposomal Powder” Problem: True liposomes are delicate, water-based vesicles. Their structure and function depend on hydration. The process of turning them into a powder, such as through spray-drying, can damage or destroy the liposomes. When you rehydrate the powder in your gut, the encapsulated nutrient can leak out before it has a chance to be absorbed, completely negating the liposomal advantage.36 While some advanced “pro-liposomal” technologies exist, you should be highly skeptical of most powdered liposomal products.
- Impossible Concentrations: Be wary of outlandish claims. For example, a product claiming to have “1000 mg of Vitamin C per 1 ml” is advertising something physically impossible. The maximum solubility of the common forms of vitamin C in water is far below this level, making the claim scientifically absurd.37
- Absurd Bioavailability Claims: You will see marketing that touts “30x more effective!” or similar numbers. This is almost always a misrepresentation of the science. The study often cited for this claim actually showed that liposomal C was about 1.5 times more bioavailable than un-encapsulated C. The “30-fold” increase mentioned in the study was the rise in blood levels compared to baseline (placebo), not compared to another form of vitamin C.37
Your Quality Checklist: A Biochemist’s Vetting Process
To protect yourself and ensure you’re getting a genuine, high-performance product, you need to think like a scientist.
Here is the checklist I personally use to vet any liposomal supplement before I consider buying it.
| The Liposomal C Quality Checklist: 6 Questions to Ask Before You Buy | |
| Checkpoint | What to Look For |
| 1. Is it Third-Party Tested? | Look for seals from reputable third-party organizations like NSF International or certifications for Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). If not present, does the company provide a Certificate of Analysis (COA) from an independent lab to prove purity and potency? Transparency is key.17 |
| 2. What’s the Phospholipid Source? | The highest-quality products use phospholipids derived from non-GMO sunflower lecithin. Be more cautious with products using soy lecithin, which is often cheaper and may be a concern for those with soy sensitivities.21 |
| 3. What Else is in It? | Scrutinize the “Other Ingredients” list. A good product should have a short list. Red flags include high fructose corn syrup, sucrose, sorbitol, artificial flavors, and excessive preservatives like potassium sorbate or sodium benzoate.28 |
| 4. Is the Price Realistic? | True liposomal manufacturing is a complex, multi-step, and expensive process. If a product is suspiciously cheap compared to reputable brands, it’s highly likely that corners were cut or that it isn’t a genuine liposomal product at all.35 |
| 5. Are the Claims Believable? | Does the marketing make scientifically impossible claims like “bypasses the digestive system” (it can’t) or promise absurd levels of effectiveness (e.g., “64x better absorption”) without linking to robust, peer-reviewed human studies on their specific product?.36 |
| 6. What’s the Form? | Be most skeptical of powdered forms and softgels, as these present the most significant technical challenges for maintaining liposome integrity.36 A true liquid liposomal suspension is often the most reliable form, though this is not an absolute guarantee of quality. |
Conclusion: From Frustration to Clarity: My Final Recommendations
My journey into the world of vitamin C began with frustration and ended with clarity.
By abandoning the flawed “more is better” model and embracing a framework based on delivery technology, I finally found an approach that worked.
Switching to a verified, high-quality liquid liposomal vitamin C transformed my experience.
The chronic GI distress vanished completely.
I felt a tangible difference in my resilience during stressful periods, and I noticed an improvement in my skin’s clarity and texture—a direct benefit of supporting collagen synthesis effectively.1
My personal success story was the ultimate validation of the science.
Based on this entire journey, here is my simple, three-tiered recommendation framework for choosing a vitamin C supplement:
- The Foundation (For Everyone): No supplement can ever replace a healthy diet. Your first and most important source of vitamin C should always be from whole foods like citrus fruits, bell peppers, broccoli, and leafy greens. A food-first approach provides a matrix of beneficial compounds that work synergistically.2
- The Good Choice (For General Wellness & Budget-Conscious): If you’re looking for a daily maintenance supplement to top up your dietary intake, a quality buffered vitamin C—such as calcium ascorbate or sodium ascorbate—is a solid and affordable option. It is significantly gentler on the stomach than plain ascorbic acid, which is a major benefit. However, remember that it is still subject to the same absorption bottleneck at high doses.7
- The Best Choice (For Targeted, High-Impact Support): For anyone with elevated needs—due to stress, smoking, high body weight, or frequent illness—or for those who simply want to ensure the maximum possible impact from their supplement, a verified, high-quality liquid liposomal vitamin C is the unequivocally superior investment. The “Armored Car” delivery system ensures that more of the nutrient gets into your cells where it’s needed, providing the benefits of a high dose without the waste and uncomfortable side effects of conventional megadosing.19
Ultimately, my journey taught me that being an empowered health advocate means looking past the flashy labels and marketing hype to understand the science underneath.
It means demanding transparency and quality from the companies we support.
The goal isn’t just to invest in products; it’s to invest in understanding.
By doing so, you can move beyond the frustrating cycle of trial and error and choose a strategy that truly works for your body.
Works cited
- What is the mechanism of Ascorbic Acid? – Patsnap Synapse, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://synapse.patsnap.com/article/what-is-the-mechanism-of-ascorbic-acid
- Vitamins and minerals – Vitamin C – NHS, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/vitamins-and-minerals/vitamin-c/
- Vitamin C | Linus Pauling Institute | Oregon State University, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://lpi.oregonstate.edu/mic/vitamins/vitamin-C
- Too much vitamin C: Is it harmful? – Mayo Clinic, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/expert-answers/vitamin-c/faq-20058030
- Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C): MedlinePlus Drug Information, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a682583.html
- Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid) – StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499877/
- Vitamin C – Health Professional Fact Sheet – NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/VitaminC-HealthProfessional/
- Questions about Vitamin C – Linus Pauling Institute Blog, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://blogs.oregonstate.edu/linuspaulinginstitute/2015/05/28/questions-about-vitamin-c/
- All There is to C – Linus Pauling Institute – Oregon State University, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://lpi.oregonstate.edu/sites/lpi.oregonstate.edu/files/vitamin_c_presentation_slides.pdf
- When is the best time to take vitamin C? – Vinmec, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.vinmec.com/eng/blog/when-is-the-best-time-to-take-vitamin-c-en
- Vitamin C Information | Mount Sinai – New York, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.mountsinai.org/health-library/nutrition/vitamin-c
- Vitamin C Side Effects: Common, Severe, Long Term – Drugs.com, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.drugs.com/sfx/vitamin-c-side-effects.html
- What’s the Best Form of Vitamins— Gummies, Pills, or Powder? – Verywell Fit, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.verywellfit.com/optimal-supplement-forms-7546496
- Types of Vitamin C: Pros and Cons – LivOn Labs, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.livonlabs.com/blogs/articles/types-of-vitamin-c-pros-and-cons
- Are Liquid Multivitamins More Effective Than Traditional Methods? – Texas Health Resources, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.texashealth.org/areyouawellbeing/Health-and-Well-Being/Are-Liquid-Multivitamins-More-Effective-Than-Traditional-Methods
- We Asked Registered Dietitians What Vitamin C Supplements They Recommend — Here’s What They Said – Everyday Health, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.everydayhealth.com/diet-nutrition-products/best-vitamin-c-supplement/
- The 9 Best Vitamin C Supplements for 2025 – Healthline, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/best-vitamin-c-supplement
- (PDF) Bioavailability and Bioactivity of Vitamin C -A Review, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350374461_Bioavailability_and_Bioactivity_of_Vitamin_C_-A_Review
- Top 5 FAQs on Liposomal Vitamin C: Benefits, Absorption & Usage, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.wbcil.com/blog/top-5-faqs-on-liposomal-vitamin-c-benefits-absorption-usage/
- What does liposomal mean? Definition & Function – MITOcare, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://mitocare.de/en/blogs/micronutrient-dictionary/what-means-liposomal
- Liposomal Vitamin C: Benefits and Frequently Asked Questions, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://bodybio.com/blogs/blog/what-is-liposomal-vitamin-c
- An analogy to understand supercomputers – Cerfacs, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://cerfacs.fr/coop/analogy-for-supercomputers
- Analogies for explaining BI concepts to non-technical people? – Reddit, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/BusinessIntelligence/comments/l3h9kz/analogies_for_explaining_bi_concepts_to/
- Analogies between Internet network and logistics service networks: challenges involved in the interconnection | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257580953_Analogies_between_Internet_network_and_logistics_service_networks_challenges_involved_in_the_interconnection
- Enhanced Bioavailability and Immune Benefits of Liposome … – MDPI, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/1661-3821/4/4/34
- Bioavailability of Liposomal Vitamin C in Powder Form: A … – MDPI, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/17/7718
- How to find the best Vitamin C supplements – Gene Food, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.mygenefood.com/blog/not-all-vitamin-c-is-created-equal/
- Vitamin C Liquid 500 mg/5 mL , 16 oz., accessed on August 8, 2025, https://medicalsupplygroup.com/products/vitamin-c-liquid-500-mg-5-ml-16-oz
- Vitamin C Liquid | Apple & Passion fruit – Land Art, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://landart.ca/en/products/vitamine-c-liquide-pomme-fruit-passion
- Factors Affecting the Vitamin C Dose-Concentration Relationship: Implications for Global Vitamin C Dietary Recommendations – MDPI, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/15/7/1657
- Factors Affecting Vitamin C Status and Prevalence of Deficiency: A Global Health Perspective – PMC, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7400679/
- FDA 101: Dietary Supplements | FDA, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/fda-101-dietary-supplements
- Altrient C Welcomes Latest ASA Ruling On Clarity Of Liposomal Vitamin C Marketing, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.altrient.com/de/blog/altrient-c-welcomes-latest-asa-ruling-on-clarity-of-liposomal-vitamin-c-marketing
- YourZooki Ltd – ASA | CAP, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.asa.org.uk/rulings/yourzooki-ltd-a20-1083951-yourzooki-ltd.html
- Liposomal vitamin C – beware of the quality of products on the market! – NEOBOTANICS.cz, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://neobotanics.cz/en/blogs/news/lipozomalni-vitamin-c-pozor-na-kvalitu-produktu-na-trhu
- The NAD⁺ liposome problem: supplement science vs marketing claims, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://nutraceuticalbusinessreview.com/the-nad-liposome-problem-supplement-science-vs-marketing
- all science no fiction | lipolife debunks liposomal marketing claims, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://lipolife.co.uk/all-science-no-fiction/
- 7 Best Vitamin C Supplements – Medical News Today, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/best-vitamin-c-supplements
- Liposomal Vitamin C – DaVinci Laboratories, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.davincilabs.com/liposomal-c-12.html
- Ascorbic acid (oral route) – Side effects & dosage – Mayo Clinic, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/ascorbic-acid-oral-route/description/drg-20068031






